Thread:ClodaghelmC/@comment-3263704-20190430104912/@comment-3263704-20190430134853

Making it easier to add categories is not an excuse for how you name your pictures. I have taken the time to categorize pictures, and with different names even with it taking longer I got it done. It takes more work, but it is doable. I don't believe in naming pictures in way that makes categories easier to add. What is an extra ten minutes or so to have pictures that are well named and then put them in a list and manually add file in front of them and then sort them before putting categories on them. I have done that with tons of pictures when needed to put pictures already on the wiki in a new category by copying all the images into a notepad document and manually putting file in front of them by copying the text "File:" and pasting it in front of each picture name. I don't like doing it because it takes time but I do it anyway because I have pictures that are named that are descriptive. You aren't lazy, but you are taking the easy route in your system. I understand that it is easier because then you know what categories to put on what images, but it still does not make that naming convention as acceptable as others. But whatever, you have already done it at this point, and there really is no changing it.